Democracy under the Matterhorn
In direct democracy every citizen has an opinion and a vote.
The populace is the governing body. This truly the original Greek term ‘demokratia’, means – rule by people.
But as democracy evolved, it became representative. In India, we elect representatives who go on to form the governing body, not us.
Which is better?
Modern-era ideas of citizenry and law-making begin with the Federal Charter of 1291 when 3 cantons came together to form a confederation. In 1891, the Swiss added the term ‘constitutional amendment initiative’ which gives them the right to propose changes to their Constitution.
Over the years, a couple of hundred amendments have been put to public referendum, with every citizen voting. Of these, only 10% have actually been approved by the people.
In 2012, in Taiwan a group of 4 ethical hackers built a citizen audit engine for Taiwan’s central government budget.
Accounting and Statistics Office data was made accessible, comprehensible and interactive for the citizen. Citizens could now rate and comment on the budget.
This became the foundation of the gov-zero movement (gØv) now an active civic-tech community.
The gØv movement and vTaiwan use technology to scale direct democracy.
As one of the pioneers of the movement, Andrew Lang puts it, “Before, democracy was a showdown between two opposing values. Now, democracy is a conversation between many diverse values.”
As I lie awake,
I wonder, will we?
Will India see
change as well?